Course Content Outcomes

Suggested Artifact

Evidence

Description

1.   Understand that current educational and training instructional practices are frequently ineffective because they lack a systematic, well thought-out approach.

1.   Summary, abstract and reaction paper to, Can America Compete?≤

1.   Our educational and economical ≥grips≤ on the world are slipping as the rest of the world is finding the desire to catch up to, and pass us

2.   Understand the theoretical rationale and practical implications for each phase of the ADDIE Model.

2.   Entire final project (summative evaluation)

2.   Each week of the course was devoted to understanding and applying a part of the model.

3.   Understand that the ADDIE Model used in MC70 is just one of many instructional design models, and its usefulness will depend upon the expertise of the instructional designer.

3.   The ≥Design Phase≤ of the final project.

3.   The ADDIE model does not specify delivery strategies, only what content should be delivered. Thus, the delivery strategies employed by the teacher will largely determine the success of the course.

4.   Other instructional models may better suit a different learning environment.

4.   A redesigned ADDIE Model

4.   The ADDIE Model can be adapted to the particular environment of the instructional designer.

Course Process

Outcome

Suggested ePortfolio Artifact

Evidence

Description

1.   Multimedia InteractivityãLevel 3

1.   Hypertext on final project.

1.   My final project was saved to the Web and employs hypertext as part of the navigation scheme.

2.   Authentic LearningãLevel 3

2.   Final project.

2.   The entire project was based on an authentic organizational need.

3.   Ethical ResponsibilityãLevel 1

3.   All formative evaluations 1.2 (paper summaries, abstracts and reactions)

3.   Proper attribution was give for the authorπs opinion in the summary and abstract section.

4.   DesignãLevel 1

4.   Entire final project

4.   CRAP principles were adhered to when designing the final course document.

5.   ResearchãLevel 2

5.   ≥Gap Analysis≤ for the final project.

5.   The organizational gap was from the organization that I currently work in and was derived from the data that were collected.

6.   CollaborationãLevel 2

6.   Multimedia Review of the ≥Alaska CD.≤

6.   The project turned in was a collaborative effort between group membersäalthough never easy trying to balance our schedules for any collaborative work!